Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant : A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Gonzalez Quintero, Catalina. (Auteur)
Support: E-Book
Langue: Anglais
Publié: Cham : Springer International Publishing.
Collection: Synthese library (Online) ; 449
Sujets:
Autres localisations: Voir dans le Sudoc
Résumé: This book offers an unprecedented study of the influence of the skepticism of the New Platonic Academy on David Hume's and Immanuel Kant's critiques of metaphysics. By demonstrating how the skeptical teachings of the Academy affected these authors' Enlightened attacks on traditional metaphysics, this book deepens and broadens the burgeoning scholarship on the role that the Ancients schools of skepticism played in the configuration of Modern skeptical outlooks. It bolsters the newfound recognition that we must reconsider the conventional view that the revival of Pyrrhonism in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries gave birth to Modern skepticism by incorporating the influence of Academic skepticism in the analysis. Giving a new impetus to this line of research, the author argues that Academic ideas and methods informed Hume's and Kant's critique of metaphysics in substantial and thus far unacknowledged ways. Specifically, she demonstrates the centrality of Academic skepticism to Hume's epistemology and critique of religion through a detailed analysis of his theory of belief in the Treatise and the first Enquiry as well as of its application in the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. Likewise, her analysis reveals how Kant's anti-metaphysical stance, developed in the Transcendental Dialectic of the Critique of Pure Reason, contains many skeptical insights of Academic inspiration, bequeathed to him by Hume.
Accès en ligne: Accès à l'E-book
Lien: Collection principale: Synthese library (Online)
LEADER 03880cmm a2200469 i 4500
001 ebook-275891399
005 20240322122725.0
007 cr|uuu---uuuuu
008 240220t20XX2022sz |||| |||d u||||||eng d
020 |a 9783030897505 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-030-89750-5  |2 DOI 
035 |a (OCoLC)1423769807 
035 |a Springer_ebooks_ln_philo_978-3-030-89750-5 
040 |a ABES  |b fre  |e AFNOR 
041 0 |a eng  |2 639-2 
050 4 |a B1-5802 
082 0 |a 109  |2 23 
100 1 |0 (IdRef)181060116  |1 http://www.idref.fr/181060116/id  |a Gonzalez Quintero, Catalina.  |4 aut.  |e Auteur 
245 1 0 |a Academic Skepticism in Hume and Kant :  |b A Ciceronian Critique of Metaphysics   |c by Catalina González Quintero. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer International Publishing. 
264 2 |a Cham :  |b Springer Nature,  |c [20..]. 
336 |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |b c  |2 rdamedia 
337 |b b  |2 isbdmedia 
338 |b ceb  |2 RDAfrCarrier 
490 1 |a Synthese Library, Studies in Epistemology, Logic, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science,  |x 2542-8292 ;  |v 449 
506 |a Accès en ligne pour les établissements français bénéficiaires des licences nationales 
506 |a Accès soumis à abonnement pour tout autre établissement 
520 |a This book offers an unprecedented study of the influence of the skepticism of the New Platonic Academy on David Hume's and Immanuel Kant's critiques of metaphysics. By demonstrating how the skeptical teachings of the Academy affected these authors' Enlightened attacks on traditional metaphysics, this book deepens and broadens the burgeoning scholarship on the role that the Ancients schools of skepticism played in the configuration of Modern skeptical outlooks. It bolsters the newfound recognition that we must reconsider the conventional view that the revival of Pyrrhonism in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries gave birth to Modern skepticism by incorporating the influence of Academic skepticism in the analysis. Giving a new impetus to this line of research, the author argues that Academic ideas and methods informed Hume's and Kant's critique of metaphysics in substantial and thus far unacknowledged ways. Specifically, she demonstrates the centrality of Academic skepticism to Hume's epistemology and critique of religion through a detailed analysis of his theory of belief in the Treatise and the first Enquiry as well as of its application in the Dialogues concerning Natural Religion. Likewise, her analysis reveals how Kant's anti-metaphysical stance, developed in the Transcendental Dialectic of the Critique of Pure Reason, contains many skeptical insights of Academic inspiration, bequeathed to him by Hume. 
540 |a Conditions particulières de réutilisation pour les bénéficiaires des licences nationales  |c https://www.licencesnationales.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2021-17-MAPA-Collex_ouvrages_Philosophie_CCTP.pdf 
559 1 |a 1. Introduction -- 2. The Skepticism of the New Academy: From Epoche to Persuasion -- 3. Academic Skepticism and Metaphysics: On the Gods and the Immortal Soul -- 4. Hume's Academic Skepticism: A Normative Theory of Belief -- 5. Hume and Cicereo on Metaphysics: Philo's Non-dogmatic Deism -- 6. Skepticism vs. Skeptical Method: Sources of Ancient and Modern Skepticism in Kant -- 7. Kant's Critical Solution to the Antinomies as an Academic Response to the Apraxia Objection -- 8. Conclusion. 
650 0 |a Philosophy  |x History.  |2 lc 
650 0 |a Science  |x History.  |2 lc 
653 |a History of Philosophy 
653 |a History of Science 
760 0 |t Synthese library (Online)  |g 449  |w (ABES)199316252 
830 0 |a Synthese library (Online) ;  |v 449 
856 |u https://doi-org.srvext.uco.fr/10.1007/978-3-030-89750-5  |z Accès à l'E-book 
886 2 |2 unimarc  |a 181  |a i#  |b xxxe## 
993 |a E-Book  
994 |a BNUM 
995 |a 275891399