Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience

Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteur principal: Schulkin, Jay (1952-....). (Auteur)
Support: E-Book
Langue: Anglais
Publié: Cham : Springer International Publishing.
Sujets:
Autres localisations: Voir dans le Sudoc
Résumé: This book explores the cultures of philosophy and the law as they interact with neuroscience and biology, through the perspective of American jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes' Jr., and the pragmatist tradition of John Dewey. Schulkin proposes that human problem solving and the law are tied to a naturalistic, realistic and an anthropological understanding of the human condition. The situated character of legal reasoning, given its complexity, like reasoning in neuroscience, can be notoriously fallible. Legal and scientific reasoning is to be understood within a broader context in order to emphasize both the continuity and the porous relationship between the two. Some facts of neuroscience fit easily into discussions of human experience and the law. However, it is important not to oversell neuroscience: a meeting of law and neuroscience is unlikely to prove persuasive in the courtroom any time soon. Nevertheless, as knowledge of neuroscience becomes more reliable and more easily accepted by both the larger legislative community and in the wider public, through which neuroscience filters into epistemic and judicial reliability, the two will ultimately find themselves in front of a judge. A pragmatist view of neuroscience will aid and underlie these events.
Accès en ligne: Accès à l'E-book
LEADER 03621cmm a2200505 i 4500
001 ebook-270729453
005 20231203151102.0
007 cr|uuu---uuuuu
008 230627t20XX2019sz |||| |||d |||||||eng d
020 |a 9783030231002 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2  |2 DOI 
035 |a Springer-41175-978-3-030-23100-2 
035 |a Springer_ebooks_ln_philo_978-3-030-23100-2 
040 |a ABES  |b fre  |e AFNOR 
041 0 |a eng  |2 639-2 
050 4 |a B832.A-832.Z 
082 0 |a 144.3  |2 23 
100 1 |0 (IdRef)033090351  |1 http://www.idref.fr/033090351/id  |a Schulkin, Jay  |d (1952-....).  |4 aut.  |e Auteur 
245 1 0 |a Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., Pragmatism and Neuroscience   |c by Jay Schulkin. 
264 1 |a Cham :  |b Springer International Publishing. 
264 2 |a Cham :  |b Springer Nature,  |c [20..]. 
336 |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |b c  |2 rdamedia 
337 |b b  |2 isbdmedia 
338 |b ceb  |2 RDAfrCarrier 
506 |a Accès en ligne pour les établissements français bénéficiaires des licences nationales 
506 |a Accès soumis à abonnement pour tout autre établissement 
520 |a This book explores the cultures of philosophy and the law as they interact with neuroscience and biology, through the perspective of American jurist Oliver Wendell Holmes' Jr., and the pragmatist tradition of John Dewey. Schulkin proposes that human problem solving and the law are tied to a naturalistic, realistic and an anthropological understanding of the human condition. The situated character of legal reasoning, given its complexity, like reasoning in neuroscience, can be notoriously fallible. Legal and scientific reasoning is to be understood within a broader context in order to emphasize both the continuity and the porous relationship between the two. Some facts of neuroscience fit easily into discussions of human experience and the law. However, it is important not to oversell neuroscience: a meeting of law and neuroscience is unlikely to prove persuasive in the courtroom any time soon. Nevertheless, as knowledge of neuroscience becomes more reliable and more easily accepted by both the larger legislative community and in the wider public, through which neuroscience filters into epistemic and judicial reliability, the two will ultimately find themselves in front of a judge. A pragmatist view of neuroscience will aid and underlie these events. 
540 |a Conditions particulières de réutilisation pour les bénéficiaires des licences nationales  |c https://www.licencesnationales.fr/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2022-02-MAPA-Collex_ouvrages_Philosophie_CCTP.pdf 
559 1 |a 1. Introduction -- 2. Holmes' Critical Experience in War -- 3. Experience, Inference and Surviving -- 4. Holmes, Pragmatism and Nature -- 5. Duty, Surviving, Social Contract -- 6. Emersonian Sensibilities -- 7. Bounded Choice, Human Freedom and Problem Solving -- 8. Naturalizing Decision-Making -- 9. Ethics, Body Politic, and Neuroscience -- 10. Neuroscientific Considerations and the Law -- 11. Conclusion. . 
650 0 |a Pragmatism.  |2 lc 
650 0 |a Law-Philosophy.  |2 lc 
650 0 |a Political science-Philosophy.  |2 lc 
650 0 |a Law-History.  |2 lc 
650 0 |a Philosophy of mind.  |2 lc 
653 |a Pragmatism 
653 |a Philosophy of Law 
653 |a Political Philosophy 
653 |a Theories of Law, Philosophy of Law, Legal History 
653 |a Philosophy of Mind 
856 |u https://doi-org.srvext.uco.fr/10.1007/978-3-030-23100-2  |z Accès à l'E-book 
886 2 |2 unimarc  |a 181  |a i#  |b xxxe## 
993 |a E-Book  
994 |a BNUM 
995 |a 270729453